22.2.10

G.Mahler - Symphonie Nr.5 in cis-moll / Claudio Abbado / Berliner Philharmoniker / DG / 1993




Gustav Mahler -

Symphonie Nr.5 in cis-moll


Claudio Abbado / Berliner Philharmoniker


Deutsche Grammophon / Recorded in May 1993 / Issued in 1993


The Adagietto is suddenly, almost imperceptibly, there. It is the hallmark of any great performance of the symphony, and Abbado is in amongst the very select few as these magical bars materialize. It might even be the most beautiful, the most subtly inflected account of the movement we have yet heard on disc. Never mind Gilbert Kaplan's eight-minute watermark (Abbado actually takes 8'58''), feeling the ebb and flow, the inner pulse of this music is about finding its golden mean; it is about eliminating barlines and freeing the spirit from the letter of the score—whatever the tempo. This is how the music goes for Abbado: it's a song in the making, an invention of the moment, and these wonderful Berlin strings are one voice, infinitely pliable. How spontaneously the restless heart leaps with Mahler's central diversion; the breathless pianopianissimo to a barely grazed glissando towards the close is out of this world.
So too the huge central Scherzo, another of those testing movements separating natural Mahlerians from the would-bes. The key here is patience—respect for space, silence, atmosphere. As overlapping horns reach for their first major summit and panoramic vistas are promised, Mahler's critical pause bars come dramatically into play (skimp these at your peril). Abbado sits majestically atop the first of them: time stands still, all nature stops to listen. Mahler, the pantheist, is in his element. And all the elements here are beautifully, idiomatically characterized: the rustic but genteel waltz of the second subject, inbred rubatos positively slipping off the bow; the pizzicato variant, not too strict, a touch uncoordinated like an unschooled country band; the 'shy' solo oboe emerging so tentatively from this bucolic scene; the many quixotic changes of expression. And the charm. Not even Bernstein (also DG) quite matches Abbado's relish of the finale's airborne fantasy (how commonly this movement is driven to distraction): it's that delicate balance between tip-toeing sweetness and light and inherently rugged, foot-stomping good humour.
Mackerras (an impressive contender, not to be overlooked) comes up trumps here, too. And both he and Abbado take an appreciably more dispassionate view of the first movement than Bernstein (doesn't everybody?). Abbado steps back from the tragedy, his funeral march determined to keep up appearances, maintain dignity, the voice (so to speak) cracking only under the stress of Mahler's accentuation. There's a suitably rash development, precipitato horns leaping spectacularly for their high concert-F, and a splendidly morbid military wind band sound when the march returns centre-stage. Bernstein is at his most wilfully exciting in the second movement. You won't, for instance, find Abbado pulling back on the tempo as his Berlin strings dip deep at 9'04'', or indeed at 11'02'' (Wuchtig) where Bernstein effects a monstrously theatrical (and unsolicited) meno mosso, every instrument mired in despondency, only the trombones defiant. And fine though Abbado is, no one peaks at the climax—the shining trumpet-led premonition of the finale's chorale—quite like Bernstein. Both are special performances (nothing less could challenge the supremacy of Bernstein for me), both conductors and both orchestras right inside the spirit and sound of this score, Abbado much freer and less calculating over detail than he can sometimes be (and was in his earlier Chicago recording—10/81). In the eye of the second movement storm is an extraordinary passage for shell-shocked cellos over rolling timpani: it's rather like the Adagietto, only a select few get through to the subtext. Abbado is one.

E.Elgar - Symphonie Nr.1 in As-Dur / Sir John Barbirolli / Philharmonia Orchestra / EMI / 2001

Edward Elgar -
Symphonie Nr.1 in As-Dur

Sir John Barbirolli /
Philharmonia Orchestra

EMI CLASSICS / Recorded in August 1962 / Issued in 2001

What can one say? One loves Barbirolli's Elgar in spite of everything. In this instance 'everything' might refer to his monolithic pacing of the First Symphony: the somewhat leaden first movement in which the drama of Elgar's tempo contrasts (and the relationships therein) go for nought and the fleeting lyric remnants (gorgeous in themselves) never sound threatened. Consider, too, the finale's allegro: so very measured; whatever happened to its urgency, the shock of impulse? I think the answer is that you don't ask, nor do you make direct comparisons with the likes of Slatkin (RCA, 6/91) or Tate (EMI, 1/93) whose big, brave, dangerous readings (prime choices, both) take Elgarian instability to its limits. Barbirolli is Barbirolli, and that, at the very least, means wholehearted. I've come to expect the first subject of the slow movement to breathe more imperceptively into life (all the lower dynamics could be more rarefied), but don't ever expect to hear it more richly or spontaneously bowed. The cellos, of course, enjoy Barbirolli's very special attention (such a warm, refulgent sound), but it's the overall style of the string playing (impossible to imitate, indeed to describe) that remains such an abiding pleasure. After fig. 104 at around 8'56'' (molto espressivo et sostenuto) just listen to the violins negotiate their ascent to the high C sharp—that's what it's all about. And again, at that moment of supreme rapture in the finale (the transformation of the cadaverous opening march), how often does one hear such intensity and sweetness of tone from a body of violins?
EMI's 1962 Kingsway Hall recordings (superbly remastered) perfectly enshrine the Barbirolli bloom: Cockaigne is possessed of a Falstaffian girth and jollity. Nobody's first choices, then, but essential collectors items. I await the equally controversial but yet more potent account of the Second Symphony in EMI's 1964 recording with the Halle.



G.Mahler - Symphonie Nr.2 in c-moll, "Auferstehung / Resurrection" / Leonard Bernstein / New York Philharmonic / DG / 1990

Gustav Mahler -
Symphonie Nr.2 in c-moll, "Auferstehung / Resurrection"

Leonard Bernstein / New York Philharmonic

Deutsche Grammophon / Recorded in April 1987 / Issued in 1990

Like several others who have written reviews here, I, too, was in the audience when this concert was recorded. Unlike the others, I have yet to hear the cd, although I've spent nearly 20 years wanting to hear it and to experience that evening again. It was, by far, the single most powerful musical experience of my life. Just thinking of it brings back the tremendous emotions of that night in April 1987. Allow me to add some things that no one else who was there has mentioned. Not only were we informed beforehand that the concert was being recorded -- can't say that I remember being given cough drops -- I must say I was in a daze afterward and have been ever since -- but we knew that at the end of the concert, Bernstein would be given the Albert Schweitzer Music Award. Despite rather extreme poverty, I had treated myself to the concert as a 32nd birthday present to myself. It was worth far far more to me than the month of peanut butter sandwiches that followed. The only seat I could afford was in one of the upper balconies on the right side of the auditorium; I sat close to the railing and could see the orchestra, the soloists and Bernstein from above. Once the music started, I don't remember moving, blinking or even breathing until the last note played. It was shattering. It was exhilarating. When the music ended, the audience took a collective breath and exhaled very slowly. All around me, I could hear people sobbing. After what seemed like several minutes, but was probably only a few seconds, the cheering started, rolling over me in waves. Before I even knew I'd left my seat, I was on my feet. I glanced at my watch, realizing to my amazement how much time (94 minutes, according to others who have written here) had elapsed. The cheering continued for a good 10 minutes or so. I'm not exagerrating when I say that never before or since have I heard anything like it -- just when you thought the applause couldn't get any louder or more passionate, it grew -- not unlike the end of the Mahler 2nd itself -- and grew and grew and grew in intensity. Wanting to record this night in my memory, I took a slow look around the theater, and saw tears on nearly every face. Everyone was standing; everyone was cheering. Then, just when we'd forgotten all about it, Bernstein was presented with the Albert Schweitzer Music Award. The applause and cheers started all over again. I do recall looking at my watch as I gathered my things to leave and being stunned to realize that nearly half an hour had passed since the music ended. The crowd surrounded me as I left Avery Fisher Hall. There was an emotional bond among us. Behind me, I heard someone read my mind, saying just what I was thinking: "This piece should never be performed again. No one could ever come close to this performance." During the next several minutes as I left the theater and walked up Broadway to my apartment, that same thought echoed around me, spontaneously, it seemed. Everyone who was there seemed to have come to the same conclusion: "No one should ever attempt to play Mahler's Second again." "This was the definitive performance." "It can't be topped." "This was it. No one should ever conduct this piece of music again." Since that night, I have never again listened to Mahler's 2nd. Not a recording, and certainly not in person. I couldn't. I'd heard the best, and nothing else will do. I'm placing my order right now. I've waited nearly 20 years to get this recording, and I really don't care how much it costs. It's worth every penny to me.



P.Tchaikovsky - Symphonie Nr.6 in h-moll, "Pathetique" / Leonard Bernstein / New York Philharmonic / DG / 1990


Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky -
Symphonie Nr.6 in h-moll, "Pathetique"
Leonard Bernstein /
New York Philharmonic
Deutsche Grammophon / Recorded in August 1986 / Issued in 1990
Undoubtedly one of the most influential and emotional conductors of the 20th century, particularly in his final fifteen years of life, Leonard Bernstein was also, not surprisingly, the target of controversy during those final years as his conducting tempos got gradually slower and his conducting style became ever more flamboyant. Probably no recording he made during those final years has engendered as much debate as this live 1986 recording of Tchaikovsky's 6th Symphony (the "Pathetique"). The final symphonic utterance of Russia's greatest composer, the "Pathetique" is without question one of the most emotional outpourings in music history, normally taking 45-50 minutes to perform. On this particular recording, however, Bernstein really lets loose with the emotion, complete with tortured tempo, and brings the "Pathetique" to the finish line in just under an hour. That this should spawn such a huge controversy is not too terribly surprising, given Bernstein's history of flamboyance on the podium. Nevertheless, this live recording with his New York Philharmonic is one of incredible skill; the orchestra handles his style well as they always did, even when the first and last movements are done incredibly slow. The explosive scherzo/march that is the third movement is done here in a massive outburst that perhaps Tchaikovsky himself would never have dreamed of. Like him or hate him during his final years, Bernstein really brings out the most in the popular repertoire HIS way. And this recording is as solid proof of that as any he ever made.

13.2.10

L.v.Beethoven - Symphonie Nr.9 in d-moll, "Choral" / Peter Tiboris / Brno Philharmonic Orchestra / BRIDGE / 1993


Ludwig van Beethoven -
Symphonie Nr. 9 in d-moll, "Choral"
Peter Tiboris /
Brno Philharmonic Orchestra
Bridge Co. / Issued in 1993 / Recorded in 1991
Mahler's grand expansion of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony employs an extra 4 horns and an extra set of Timpani, revoicing many passages of the venerable masterpiece. Mahler adds occasional counter-melodies and thickens the scoring in order to create his own heightened dynamic scale. Of his own performances of this re-scoring, Mahler wrote: "Far from following any arbitrary purpose or course, but also without allowing himself to be led astray by tradition, (this conductor) was constantly and solely concerned with carrying out Beethoven's wishes in their minutest detail, and ensuring that nothing the master intended should be sacrificed or drowned out amid the general confusion of sound."

6.2.10

G.Mahler - Symphonie Nr.9 in D / Pierre Boulez / Chicago Symphony Orchestra / DG / 1998


Gustav Mahler -
Symphonie Nr.9 in D
Pierre Boulez /
Chicago Symphony Orchestra
Deutsche Grammophon / Recorded in December 1995 / Issued in 1998
This disc received the 1999 Grammy Award for "Best Orchestral Performance."Pierre Boulez is perhaps best known as one of the guiding forces of post-WWII high modernism--he has continued serial composition long after its peak, and his recording repertoire is largely that of 20th-century modernists, from Bartók to Messiaen. He has, however, dipped into Romanticism both early--Berlioz--and late--Mahler. His Mahler symphonic cycle--the Fifth and Sixth with the Vienna Philharmonic and the Seventh with the Cleveland Orchestra preceded this recording--has received mixed reviews.This Ninth, while cool and reserved by some standards, is a rich and fiery reading with the Chicago Symphony. This recording is a full five minutes longer than his live 1972 performance formerly available on the Memories label, and clearly shows the result of extended study of the work. Boulez and the orchestra move from jagged to smooth lines with ease without diminishing the effect of either or the contrasts between them. Boulez' success in this work is in some way understandable in light of the stylistic line between Mahler's composition and his own: Mahler was at the very leading edge of the Viennese late-Romantic modernism which led to Schoenberg's twelve-tone system from which the French avant-garde (which Boulez champions) followed.